Title:
|
INTERACTING WITH VIRTUAL HUMANS AND DETECTION OF FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: WHAT MAKES AN AVATAR MORE REAL THAN REAL? |
Author(s):
|
Manolya Kavakli |
ISBN:
|
978-972-8939-75-5 |
Editors:
|
Katherine Blashki |
Year:
|
2012 |
Edition:
|
Single |
Keywords:
|
Virtual Humans, Facial Expressions, Face Detection, User Experience. |
Type:
|
Full Paper |
First Page:
|
21 |
Last Page:
|
28 |
Language:
|
English |
Cover:
|
|
Full Contents:
|
click to dowload
|
Paper Abstract:
|
The goal of this project is to investigate how facial expression asymmetry is perceived and reacted to by real humans interacting with virtual humans and whether these reactions are in line with the ones that have been documented in neuropsychological studies of facial expression asymmetry. We recorded short animations of an actor expressively recounting arbitrary passages from childrens stories, using a face-tracking equipment to capture the movement of an actors face. The animations were then modified with the three final asymmetry levels (normal [asymmetric], exaggerated [asymmetric] and normalised [symmetric]) and the pairs were combined to allow the participants to rate the difference between each set. To measure user experience in the detection of facial expressions, we used two types of questionnaires: Comparisons and Assessment. In the Comparisons questionnaire, we asked the participants to compare the agents facial expressions on four axes: trustworthiness, likability, realism and naturalness. The assessment questionnaire was designed to determine whether the participants read the expressions on the faces of identical models with identical underlying facial movement but differing levels of asymmetry in vastly different ways. We conducted experiments with 52 participants using these questionnaires. We found that the symmetrical faces score the highest rates in all scales vs normal (asymmetrical) faces. The least trusted and liked faces are the ones with exaggerated facial expressions. We observed that the participants tended to use more descriptive words to assess the expressions of virtual humans with asymmetric facial expressions. The results indicate that the participants found the asymmetry more confusing or difficult to interpret when greatly exaggerated. |
|
|
|
|