Title:
|
TEACHING DIGITAL COMPETENCES IN HISTORY IN SECONDARY EDUCATION: LEARNING TO COMPOSE HISTORY TEXTS THROUGH THE WEB |
Author(s):
|
Alejandro Guijosa , Jaume Sanuy , Manoli Pifarré |
ISBN:
|
978-972-8924-83-6 |
Editors:
|
Miguel Baptista Nunes and Maggie McPherson (series editors: Piet Kommers, Pedro Isaías and Nian-Shing Chen) |
Year:
|
2009 |
Edition:
|
V II, 2 |
Keywords:
|
Learning Processes; Secondary Education; Web-based History teaching; History text coherence |
Type:
|
Short Paper |
First Page:
|
74 |
Last Page:
|
78 |
Language:
|
English |
Cover:
|
|
Full Contents:
|
click to dowload
|
Paper Abstract:
|
History teaching is a complex process basically composed of prior knowledge, disciplinary contents and teaching
methodology. This complexity is due to cultural, cognitive and epistemological aspects. Traditionally, history teaching
has been based on activities which develop memorization skills rather than comprehension ones.
Even though Information Communication Technologies (ICTs) are often presented uncritically as good tools to improve
History teaching and learning, ICTs are not the panacea of history teaching, of course. Their efficacy for teaching
depends especially on the instructional methodology used.
The mains aims of this study are: 1) to show a way to introduce the Web in secondary education classes in order to teach
and learn History; and 2) to estimate the impact effectiveness when using this methodology.
The project we present lasted one year. It is based on WebQuest (WQ) teaching methodology (Dodge, 1995) which
promotes strategies to search, manage and elaborate information through the Web. It also helps the development of
cognitive and metacognitive processing skills. The WQ-activity finishes with the elaboration of a History text.
160 students of 4th year (15-16 years old) working in pairs and from two different schools were enrolled in the study. The
2 different groups were compared in their expertise in WQ solving and in their skills on history texts elaboration.
Macrostructures in the elaborated texts are analyzed according to Van Dijk (1980). The results do not reflect important
differences between the two groups, but ongoing analyses of historical contents show good perspectives of learning. |
|
|
|
|