|
Title:
|
SCALING AGILE FRAMEWORKS VS. TRADITIONAL ROJECT PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT: COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS |
|
Author(s):
|
Andreas Grundler, Markus Westner |
|
ISBN:
|
978-989-8533-84-5 |
|
Editors:
|
Piet Kommers, Tomayess Issa, Theodora Issa, Pedro Isaías and Wendy Hui |
|
Year:
|
2019 |
|
Edition:
|
Single |
|
Keywords:
|
Project Portfolio Management, PPM, Scaling Agile Frameworks, Agile at Large |
|
Type:
|
Full Paper |
|
First Page:
|
51 |
|
Last Page:
|
62 |
|
Language:
|
English |
|
Cover:
|
|
|
Full Contents:
|
click to dowload 
|
|
Paper Abstract:
|
Practitioners have developed numerous frameworks around scaling agile and lean methods. These frameworks are more frequently being used in practice in large-scale system development activities. Therefore, they are in the scope of project portfolio management. The paper examines the conformity of selected scaling agile frameworks to the objectives of project portfolio management through qualitative analysis. Four prominent frameworks are investigated: Scrum of Scrums, Large cale Scrum, Disciplined Agile, and the Scaled Agile Framework. The study shows significant differences between the frameworks and their view on project portfolio management with the Scaled Agile Framework offering the most detailed portfolio management-relevant processes and roles. In contrast to that, Large Scale Scrum does not see the need for portfolio management but promotes self-managing teams. Two of the four frameworks share the perception shift from projects to the products, which has significant implications for practitioners because it challenges and redefines prevalent management roles and practices. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
