Title:
|
RETAIL SALES FORECASTING INFORMATION
SYSTEMS: COMPARISON BETWEEN TRADITIONAL
METHODS AND MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS |
Author(s):
|
Emerson Martins and Napoleão Verardi Galegale |
ISBN:
|
978-989-8704-37-5 |
Editors:
|
Miguel Baptista Nunes, Pedro Isaías and Philip Powell |
Year:
|
2022 |
Edition:
|
Single |
Keywords:
|
Sales Forecast, Retail, Machine Learning, Time Series, Productive Systems |
First Page:
|
30 |
Last Page:
|
38 |
Language:
|
English |
Cover:
|
|
Full Contents:
|
click to dowload
|
Paper Abstract:
|
Retail companies, as production systems, must use their resources efficiently and make strategic decisions to obtain growing
and stable revenues, especially when market conditions are becoming more competitive and profit margins are increasingly
pressured. Thus, sales forecasting is crucial to maintain competitiveness in the retail segment, but obtaining inaccurate
forecasts can lead to stock shortages, causing delays in deliveries and generating customer dissatisfaction, as well as
increasing inventory, increasing the cost of warehousing, forcing the "burn" of stock through promotional campaigns,
directly affecting profitability. Forecasting the demand for products and services and adapting the supply chain by finding
a balance has always been and will continue to be a challenge in the retail segment. This research aims to evaluate the main
methods and identify the one with the greatest accuracy in sales prediction. Based on an integrative literature review (ILR),
three main methods were evaluated: time series, artificial neural networks and machine learning algorithms. The results
show that machine learning is more suitable in terms of accuracy, particularly when models contain exogenous and
endogenous variables, in addition to allowing the identification of hidden patterns in demand that can be used to identify
market trends. However, in markets with constant demands and few external interferences, its use is not justified because,
for these cases, the use of time series is simpler and less costly. |
|
|
|
|