Title:
|
MIAV: AN INCLUSIVE METHOD FOR ACCESSIBILITY
ASSESSMENT BY VISUALLY IMPAIRED PEOPLE |
Author(s):
|
Gabriel de Almeida Souza Carneiro and Maria Alciléia Alves Rocha |
ISBN:
|
978-989-8533-91-3 |
Editors:
|
Katherine Blashki and Yingcai Xiao |
Year:
|
2019 |
Edition:
|
Single |
Keywords:
|
Accessibility, eMAG, Usability, Visual Impairmentand WCAG |
Type:
|
Full Paper |
First Page:
|
57 |
Last Page:
|
64 |
Language:
|
English |
Cover:
|
|
Full Contents:
|
click to dowload
|
Paper Abstract:
|
Today the Internet is the most popular source of information. Therefore, web content should suit both a general audience
and visually-impaired individuals. Consequently, web software products should be assessed to fulfill accessibility
standards. This paper introduces an inclusive method for accessibility assessment by visually-impaired users named MIAV.
The MIAV enables visually-impaired users to assess the accessibility of web software without supervision. This proposed
method complies with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) and the Brazilian e-Government Accessibility
Model (eMAG), combining an automated approach with an approach grounded on the user experience and opinion of
visually-impaired individuals. To design this method, we followed a sequence of steps. First, we carried out a pilot test to
identify improvements to MIAV. Second, we had three visually-impaired students apply MIAV to assess IFFluminenses
portals, Q-Academicos and Moodles accessibility. Finally, we ran AccessMonitor, an accessibility assessment tool
advised by W3C, to evaluate the same web applications and obtained two indicators: average accessibility index and
percentage of nonconformities by accessibility level. Results showed that none of the evaluated web pages met all the
accessibility criteria. The resulting average accessibility index for Q-Academico, IFFluminenses portal and Moodle were
4.3 and 5.6 and 6.8 respectively. In addition, the visually-impaired students identified several accessibility issues.
Therefore, we suggest improvements for the assessed web applications to provide a better user experience for
visually-impaired students. |
|
|
|
|