|
Title:
|
FROM DEEPFAKE TO DEEP-USEFUL:
RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES THROUGH A SYSTEMATIC
LITERATURE REVIEW |
|
Author(s):
|
Nikolaos Misirlis and Harris Bin Munawar |
|
ISBN:
|
978-989-8704-38-2 |
|
Editors:
|
Piet Kommers, Inmaculada Arnedillo Sánchez and Pedro Isaías |
|
Year:
|
2022 |
|
Edition:
|
Single |
|
Keywords:
|
Deepfake, Literature Review, Videos |
|
First Page:
|
26 |
|
Last Page:
|
32 |
|
Language:
|
English |
|
Cover:
|
|
|
Full Contents:
|
click to dowload 
|
|
Paper Abstract:
|
Deepfake videos are defined as a resulting media from the synthesis of different persons' images and videos - mostly
faces-, replacing a real one. The easy spread of such videos leads to elevate misinformation and represents a threat to
society and democracy today. The present study aims to collect and analyze the relevant literature through a systematic
procedure. We present 27 articles from scientific databases revealing threats for the society, democracies, the political life
but presents as well advantages of this technology in entertainment, gaming, education, and public life. The research
indicates high scientific interest in deepfake detection algorithms as well as the ethical aspect of such technology. This
article covers the scientific gap since, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic literature review in the
field.
A discussion has already started among academics and practitioners concerning the spread of fake news. The next step of
fake news considers the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms that create hyper-realistic videos,
called deepfake. Deepfake technology is continuously attracting the attention of scholars the last 3 years more and more.
The importance on conducting research to this field derives from the necessity to understand the theory. The first
contextual approach is related to the epistemological points-of-view of the concept. The second one is related to the
phenomenological disadvantages of the field. Despite that, the authors will try to focus not only on the disadvantages of
the field but also on the positive aspects of the technology. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
