Title:
|
COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY ON DESIGNING AND APPLYING FLIPPED CLASSROOM AT UNIVERSITIES |
Author(s):
|
Cheolil Lim, Sunyoung Kim, Jihyun Lee, Hyeonsu Kim, Hyeongjong Han |
ISBN:
|
978-989-8533-23-4 |
Editors:
|
Demetrios G. Sampson, J. Michael Spector, Dirk Ifenthaler and Pedro Isaías |
Year:
|
2014 |
Edition:
|
Single |
Keywords:
|
Flipped Classroom, Instructional Design, Case Study |
Type:
|
Full Paper |
First Page:
|
112 |
Last Page:
|
118 |
Language:
|
English |
Cover:
|
|
Full Contents:
|
click to dowload
|
Paper Abstract:
|
There have been many reports on cases where flipped classroom was applied which put greater emphasis on conducting various learning activities during class. However, there is a limitation in redesigning existing university lectures as flipped classrooms merely based on reports that describe the learning activities of and their effects on individual subjects. Therefore, for this study, flipped classroom was applied to and managed two different courses and a comparison was made on different application types and learners responses depending on the different instructors, learners, subjects and teaching methods of the class before the redesign. The result showed that the types and numbers of learning activities redesigned into flipped classrooms turned out to be different depending on the characteristics of the learners, the teaching methods of the previous class, and the types of activities that instructors thought were significant but insufficient. Moreover, surveys and interviews were conducted on positive and negative aspects of online video, learning activities, homework, and the overall flipped classrooms. We suggest different opinions according to characteristics of learners and composition of learning activities as a result. This study has its significance in demonstrating that various kinds of flipped classrooms can be designed and managed in accordance with various compositions of different courses while providing an overall guideline on how to design the course based on the different factors of each course. |
|
|
|
|